Spoken and written discourses Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

talk and written discourses - Essay spokespersonThe word discourse is picked from the Latin term discursus which is defined as conversation, speech. From a linguistic point of overhear the term discourse is defined as a continuous stretch of language, which is larger than a prison term and often constitutes coherent units such as argument, joke, sermon, or narrative A discourse is not inevitably long short conversations/ groans can be equally described as discourse just as a novel would. Discourses may be assort in many ways written or verbalise discourse classification according to level of formality classification according to genre or classification according to the number of participants, whether on or many.For a conversation to be classified as a written or intercommunicate discourse it needs to fulfill several criteria as Beaugrande (1981) explains. They acknowledge cohesion, coherence, intentionality, acceptability, informativeness, situationality, and intersexuality. This paper compares the written and spoken discourses. Differences between communicate and Written discourses The main difference between spoken and written discourse lies in the fact that spoken language must be understood forthwith whereas written discourse can be referred to many times (Crystal 1997). Unlike in written discourses, which involves average that keeps a record of its conveyed message, spoken discourse involves only when air and thus conversation is possible only up to the moment it occurs. The speed of conversation also varies between the two mediums of discourse. In spoken discourse, the vocaliser uses the speed that is appropriate for him/her such speed is not necessarily convenient for the listener. The speed in spoken discourses is unremarkably varying but faster than in written discourses. Other differences may be classified into Contextualization Spoken discourse offers a natural form of speech where the audience is usually present. This speech facilitat es powerful communication since the speakers are able to get feedback from their listeners. This, however, means that spoken discourse has much(prenominal) repetition as the audience asks for clarification on unclear points. Written discourse as Crystal (1997) explains has an audience that is usually farther away and mostly unknown. Writers experience rough disconnect in relation to the audience since the audience is not nearby the writers only try to imagine what their intended audience would appreciate. Such a quad makes writing discourses inherently much difficult compared to spoken discourses. However, some genres of spoken discourse such as academic discourse, confound minimal context of shared content, no feedback is encouraged immediately. On the other hand, some written discourses also employ the feedback of the readers who provide background information of the discourses usually through interviews. Spontaneity Spoken discourses tend to be largely unorganized where t opics can change at any moment kerfuffle and overlapping of communication can occur often (Halliday 1989). In the spoken discourses, speakers can ask for clarification as well as correct what has already been said. Written discourses, on the other hand, are more organized and grammatical (Halliday 1989). The audiences of written discourses only get the finished product and cannot make any passing or clarification. The written discourses are having limited ways of conveying their message written discourses are more constrained. Lexical characteristics Spoken discourses have a lower percentage of different words than written discourses. Spoken discourses are marked with longer and more repetitions unlike written discourses where repetitions are limited. Spoken discourses generally have shorter, less complex phrases. They discontinue more verb-based phrases and less abstract words. In addition to this, they also contain more words that refer to the speaker (Halliday 1989). Written d iscourses, on the other hand, have a more complex lexical characteris